IOBit Steals Malwarebytes’ Intellectual Property
General November 2nd, 2009Malwarebytes has recently uncovered evidence that a company called IOBit based in China is stealing and incorporating our proprietary database and intellectual property into their software. We know this will sound hard to believe, because it was hard for us to believe at first too. But after an indepth investigation, we became convinced it was true. Here is how we know.
We came across a post on the IOBit forums (cached version, since they have now deleted the original) that showed IOBit Security 360 flagging a specific key generator for our Malwarebytes’ Anti-Malware software using the exact naming scheme we use to flag such keygens: Don’t.Steal.Our.Software.A.
Dont.Steal.Our.Software.A, File, G:\Nothing Much\Anti-Spyware\Malwarebytes’ Anti-Malware v1.39\Key_Generator.exe, 9-30501
Why would IOBit detect a keygen for our software and refer to it using our database name? We quickly became suspicious. Either the forum post was fraudulent or IOBit was stealing our database.
So we dug further. We accumulated more similar evidence for other detections, and we soon became convinced that this was not a mistake, it was not a coincidence, it was not an isolated event, and it persisted presently in their current database. They are using both our database and our database format exactly.
The final confirmation of IOBit’s theft occurred when we added fake definitions to our database for a fake rogue application we called Rogue.AVCleanSweepPro. This “malware” does not actually exist: we made it up. We even manufactured fake files to match the fake definitions. Within two weeks IOBit was detecting these fake files under almost exactly these fake names.
We can’t publicly show all the evidence we found, because it is still our intellectual property: proprietary information about our database internals. But we don’t want you to have to take our word for it either, so we found a way to show you an example illustrating an indisputable pattern of theft.
Consider the file, “dummy.exe“. It is a harmless dummy executable that runs, displays a “Hello World” message box, and exits. You can see from third-party scans on VirusTotal, that no other security vendor flags this executable as malicious or even suspicious.
We created this dummy executable, then manipulated it slightly so that it matches one of the signatures in our database. We emphasize that it is still not malicious! — the signature is perfectly benign, when not in the context of actual malware, as you can see from the VirusTotal results.
We scanned the file with our own Malwarebytes’ Anti-Malware software and indeed it was flagged as “Don’t.Steal.Our.Software.A”. We scanned it with IOBit using their current build and database version and it was flagged as the same “Don’t.Steal.Our.Software.A”. We have included their log file and a screenshot of the detection. You can verify by yourself using the dummy executable and their most recent database.
We have attached two other such dummy executables to this post, so you can see for yourself. One of them, “rogue.exe“, matches our fake Rogue.AVCleanSweepPro (screenshot) definition, the other “fake.exe“, matches an Adware.NaviPromo definition (screenshot). VirusTotal results for “fake.exe” and “rogue.exe” so you can see they are benign. You can see a screenshot of our detections here.
During the course of our investigation, we uncovered additional evidence that IOBit may have stolen the proprietary databases of other security vendors as well. We are in the process of contacting these vendors.
Malwarebytes intends to pursue legal action against IOBit. We demand IOBit immediately remove all traces of Malwarebytes’ proprietary research and database from their software. We also demand IOBit be delisted from Download.com due to Terms of Service violations. This is criminal: it is theft, it is fraud, and we will not stand for it.
What can you do to help? If you feel the same way we do about this theft, we encourage you to send an email to hosting services such as Download.com and Majorgeeks.com requesting that all IOBit software be removed.
November 2nd, 2009 at 3:08 pm
Good thing you’ve caught them! They made money stealing your work
November 2nd, 2009 at 3:28 pm
[...] Sursa articol: Malwarebytes Anti-Malware Blog [...]
November 2nd, 2009 at 4:54 pm
Wow. And I’m the one who was replying to that topic. It never even dawned on me that this was a Malwarebytes database incorporated into their software. I quickly grew tired of IObit when they went from a buggy beta to a final release. I no longer post over there. They are headed down the rougeware path at a blinding pace first by adding a toolbar to an update that has many people confused and complaining, and now this.
November 2nd, 2009 at 5:22 pm
[...] Iobit stealing database from Malwarebytes Read more here… http://malwarebytes.besttechie.net/2…tual-property/ [...]
November 2nd, 2009 at 5:46 pm
Couldn’t you add IOBits software into your definitions? Should be pretty obvious they are stealing your database if their software flags itself for removal
November 2nd, 2009 at 6:57 pm
[...] Read the full story by the Malwarebytes CEO here: http://malwarebytes.besttechie.net/2009/11/02/iobit-steals-malwarebytes-intellectual-property/ [...]
November 2nd, 2009 at 7:47 pm
[...] http://malwarebytes.besttechie.net/2009/11/02/iobit-steals-malwarebytes-intellectual-property/ [...]
November 2nd, 2009 at 8:02 pm
true what they have done is something wrong and might even cause problems to their clients in the future.. how can they make things work or solve said problems if they were not the one who made it.. that is aside from the fact that it is a clear disregard of the intellectual property rights.
November 2nd, 2009 at 8:34 pm
Sounds like you should “salt” your database with detection signatures, and possibly removal instructions, for iobit products. That way they wouldn’t dare use your data in their product.
November 2nd, 2009 at 8:45 pm
Seems they removed the thread…
http://74.125.47.132/search?q=cache:7AiT5eWEygIJ:forums.iobit.com/showthread.php%3Ft%3D3325+http://forums.iobit.com/showthread.php%3Ft%3D3325&cd=1&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us&client=opera
^cached version
November 2nd, 2009 at 8:48 pm
[...] link removed on account of this. [...]
November 2nd, 2009 at 9:54 pm
Updated at 10:50 EST to included cached version of IOBit forum post.
November 3rd, 2009 at 2:00 am
[...] comments made at Marcin's blog Published Tue, Nov 3 2009 7:57 by [...]
November 3rd, 2009 at 2:20 am
Can you ask IOBIT for malware samples they are detecting. I am 100% sure they will not have any executables with them
“Made in China” – No quality checks
November 3rd, 2009 at 2:30 am
Seems the cache is gone also. Hope you got screenshot to show. They are denying it and posted a “declaration” in http://forums.iobit.com/showthread.php?t=4807
I think anti-spyware/anti-malware vendors should now detect IObit as rogue program.
November 3rd, 2009 at 3:40 am
[...] This piqued the interest of the folks over at MalwareBytes. Why on Earth would a IOBit 360 identify a keygen for MalwareBytes AntiMalware using the exact same name that MalwareBytes does? One would expect that, if the keygen file indeed contained malicious code, it would be flagged by a more generic name rather than one so vendor-specific. [...]
November 3rd, 2009 at 3:50 am
Google’s cache doesn’t seem to have it anymore, though Bing’s does (ick, bing): http://cc.bingj.com/cache.aspx?q=%22http+forums+iobit+com+showthread+php+t+3325%22&d=4975839906562687&mkt=en-US&setlang=en-US&w=cef7093a,c4461288
Screencap: http://www.boredomsoft.org/articles/Media/IOBit_MB_cache_screentshot.png
November 3rd, 2009 at 6:45 am
Really sorry to hear about this. I am just a typical housewife who uses her computer for personal use. I have been using IOBit for a few months now. I like some of their programs and use them regularly. Today, I will be removing their product completely from machine. Sad that companies feel a need to further their own growth by stealing others hard work.
November 3rd, 2009 at 7:00 am
[...] articol publicat ieri pe blogul MalwareBytes acestea ii acuza pe cei de la IObit pentru furarea semnaturilor. “Malwarebytes has recently [...]
November 3rd, 2009 at 8:31 am
What does the 360 mean in their so called security suite ?
Stolen from any direction ?
November 3rd, 2009 at 8:58 am
Zaphod is correct. Map makes “copyright” their maps by including small mistakes, so if they are used w/o payment it is clear who actually did the work. I have a road map of my area that shows 3 roads connecting that do not. The original blueprint has 2, but not the 3rd. Clever.
I was am stung by the toolbar issue (added to my system w/o request), can’t be removed by instructions given in the product, or the first two emails they sent, or the snappy insulting responses I got at their web site. Reckon Firefox isn’t mainstream enough to test with.
I hope if they guilty they get it in the neck.
November 3rd, 2009 at 9:13 am
I have a greater idea for such fradulent companies like IObit. Malwarebytes should have included many genuine softwares in their database and allowed the cheats like IObit to steal their database…that would have resulted into loads of “False Positives” in the IObit scans…..just to teach a lesson
November 3rd, 2009 at 10:02 am
The huge global company I work for has blocked access to http://www.iobit.com with the following message:
Technical Information:
URL: “http://iobit.com/”
Category: “unavailable;Computers/Internet;Spyware Effects/Privacy Concerns;Illegal/Questionable”
November 3rd, 2009 at 11:22 am
Grab the IP Block they’re harvesting the DB from, redirect it to a secondary Database and do what you want… Quick, easy and causes them problems since they’re stealing the software.
November 3rd, 2009 at 11:51 am
If you can not TRUST the company behind the software…you can not trust the software itself.
Here is their company information for any who need it:
IObit Information Technology
1st floor of 8th building, No 16, Lansiduan, Erhuanlu
Xiaojiahe, High-tech R&D district
ChengDu, Sichuan 610000
CHINA
Xue, Qiushi timxue@iobit.com
partner@iobit.com
+86-28-852722386
Fax: +86-28-852270825
Domain Owner: Hugo Dong
====================================================
As a personal note, even if they had not been caught stealing, I still would have grave hesitations about entrusting my computer’s security to a company in China. Even if the company staff themselves have no intent to distribute malicious software, I think the possibility of their coercive government “making them an offer they can’t refuse” is a very real possibility. If you doubt that China’s government might consider something like this, download a copy of Northrop Grumman’s Report on China’s Cyberwar Capabilities – http://bit.ly/2C5CC9
One final note: When you uninstall IObit 360, you should carefully scan your computer for numerous remnants that the program fails to remove. I would recommend Revo Uninstaller http://www.revouninstaller.com/ It does not get all of them, but it gets more than IObit 360’s uninstaller. A follow-up registry cleaning would also be a good idea.
November 3rd, 2009 at 1:51 pm
[...] [...]
November 3rd, 2009 at 2:01 pm
[...] http://www.wilderssecurity.com/showthread.php?t=257222 http://malwarebytes.besttechie.net/2…tual-property/ http://forum.avast.com/index.php?topic=48060 Gegendarstellung: [...]
November 3rd, 2009 at 2:10 pm
[...] scheme, which includes the phrase “Don’t Steal Our Software,” according to a blog post on the Malwarebytes.org [...]
November 3rd, 2009 at 3:02 pm
[...] scheme, which includes the phrase “Don’t Steal Our Software,” according to a blog post on the Malwarebytes.org [...]
November 3rd, 2009 at 4:01 pm
Freebie link still showing on CNET site (even after Elinor Mills posted her piece about this debacle)-
http://news.cnet.com/8301-13845_3-10378872-58.html
http://db.iobit.com/license-free/win7-special-offer.php
November 3rd, 2009 at 6:37 pm
[...] They are using both our database and our database format exactly.” The company reported in a blog post. “During the course of our investigation, we uncovered additional evidence that IObit may have [...]
November 3rd, 2009 at 6:46 pm
Don’t you know they’re protected by Chinese copyright? The right to copy anything they damn please!
November 3rd, 2009 at 7:11 pm
[...] More detail at: http://malwarebytes.besttechie.net/2009/11/02/iobit-steals-malwarebytes-intellectual-property/ [...]
November 3rd, 2009 at 7:51 pm
What’s even more disconcerting is that their Advanced System Care and SmartRam software products (both excellent free products, so I thought) will now fall under suspicion. I’ve suggested these wares to many people…geeze I hope this doesn’t bite me in the rear.
November 4th, 2009 at 12:21 am
I am a junior member on IObit participating in the contest.When I asked about their genuinity they removed my comments.
This is ridiculous, IObit has removed all the comments from their site and now inturn putting the blame that it can also be vice-versa, that Malwarebytes is maligning IObit’s image to get the publicity.
November 4th, 2009 at 12:28 am
What I feel now is that it has launched this fake contest just to gather the database through the users and getting free publicity…..It seems to me now that IObit is a fake (Rogue) program….
November 4th, 2009 at 1:44 am
Ben says:
“Couldn’t you add IOBits software into your definitions? Should be pretty obvious they are stealing your database if their software flags itself for removal”
LOL!! Love the idea. Just tag it with “Dont.Steal.Our.Software.A” with the threat description leading to the page that pionts out they stole the db.
November 4th, 2009 at 1:48 am
Many of the IObit members are unhappy like I am. View the comments.
http://forums.iobit.com/showthread.php?p=29219&posted=1#post29219
November 4th, 2009 at 1:52 am
this also
http://forums.iobit.com/showthread.php?p=29218#post29218
November 4th, 2009 at 2:47 am
well, hwo knows that iobit got a little problem with their software, malwarebyte cannot just accused iobit like that.
malwarebytes should find a complete evidence before accusing iobit jusat like that. well, i like using iobit security 360, as it give free real time protecton than malwarebytes.
November 4th, 2009 at 3:38 am
Actually, this was illegal by stealing virus names from databases and how did they got the virus list? Did it got downloaded by IObit?
November 4th, 2009 at 3:44 am
IoBit is a thief team, they not only steal the code from you, but also steal the code from open source defragment product. It is wellknown in china.
360 means they are stealing anything they can steal.
November 4th, 2009 at 3:47 am
We should not let this kind of company to live.
They are selling the things which steal from others.
How a stupid company they are!
November 4th, 2009 at 4:02 am
*ALL* the antivirus vendors world wide does the same. It isn’t nothing new at all because, I repeat, all the AV companies copies the others. And, in fact, I think that is something normal: You don’t what is the volume of malware each AV receives daily: thousands of samples daily.
So, in short, it isn’t in anyway anything new: They’re doing just what all the AV vendor does.
November 4th, 2009 at 5:46 am
on it now!
November 4th, 2009 at 7:27 am
wtf – one company stealing from another, all of them stealing from us – who cares?
as long as a big company gets f…ed i don’t care.
let marxism rule
November 4th, 2009 at 12:59 pm
IoBit = Nothing, IoBit = Thief.
What a shame!
November 4th, 2009 at 1:38 pm
what a shame to defend big industry!
marx said capitalists will sell the rope they are hanged with
and they deserve it
rofl
November 4th, 2009 at 1:57 pm
Ignore the comment above, title spelled wrong
November 4th, 2009 at 2:03 pm
Upvote for malwarebytes (title spelled right):
http://www.reddit.com/r/WTF/comments/a0zuh/wtf_iobit_stealing_malwarebytes_database/
(admin, please delete other comment)
November 4th, 2009 at 2:09 pm
Done, thanks for the link!
November 4th, 2009 at 3:37 pm
from china.. what do you expect
November 4th, 2009 at 8:22 pm
[...] scheme, which includes the phrase “Don’t Steal Our Software,” according to a blog post on the Malwarebytes.org [...]
November 4th, 2009 at 11:35 pm
I was constructing a comparison report of IObit with various other Antispywares “The detections of IObit were very less and that also with the help of stolen database” …..One of them that impressed me quite a lot is “Advanced System Protector”. They have a great database that improves there detection, they provide detail logs of all the definitions, they have safe list and much more.
Most importantly they donot steal the database!
November 5th, 2009 at 12:00 am
Marcin and folks,
Glad to see you found this out early – prosecute them to the fullest extent the law will allow!
November 5th, 2009 at 2:10 am
Guys, add us to the list of sites supporting malwarebytes – we have since ammended all listings from IObit but actually this was based on a slightly different reason from your explanation above: http://www.freewarebb.com/IObit-Security-360-Pro-t50236.html
Kind Regards
Marko
November 5th, 2009 at 4:11 am
@ S
you’re a racist – maybe kkk?
what does one expect from america? guantanamo, abu ghraib etc. – that is what you stand for – haha!!!
November 5th, 2009 at 4:29 am
Something from other guy:
http://blogs.computerworld.com/15026/iobit_accused_of_stealing_from_malwarebytes#comment-165497
I have to tell all of you the truth all I know.
This company is invested by some guy from the chinese “FBI”. they want to have as many netbot in the west as they can. They already made millions of users and controled these computers in the west. The can do any thing when they want.
This is the strategy from their leader. they made all their products free and spread them in the west.
There are many popular “chinese” product in download.com from china. from their website, you can never know where they come from.
Interesting? If you want to know more, I can tell you more.
November 5th, 2009 at 7:04 am
IoBit is invested by the government of China. They are trying to collect users as netbot in the west. They made a lot of freeware. The goverment of China will pay for them for per download.
There is a big deal.
November 5th, 2009 at 7:49 am
Stupid IObit.I’ve been using its advanced system care for 1 year and wasn’t satisfied.I then triedtheir new secuirty solution and liked it.I was impressed on how fast they became good.But now I know that all that is fake!!IObit stole Malwarebytes database?!They might have done the same with other vendors.I didn’t even know that it was chinese.Stupid Chinese company.I’ll remove all their products.I hope Malwarebytes wins in its persue:)IObit….go to HELL
November 5th, 2009 at 10:34 am
I agree with post 52.. really they are in China, of course they are gonna rip off everyone elses work. flame away it’s a trend that doesn’t lie….
November 5th, 2009 at 5:22 pm
Please provide us with information on what e-mail address or what page to navigate to on CNet and Major Geeks — thank you. Your software is the best, and it’s sickening that another company is ripping off your definitions and propriety detection engine.
November 6th, 2009 at 3:33 am
[...] Alll across the internet it seems as if IObit name is getting ridiculed by these allegations. RESTMalwarebytes blog [...]
November 6th, 2009 at 4:41 am
ZDNet promotes IOBit 360 today:
http://downloads.zdnet.com/abstract.aspx?docid=1175367&tag=nl.e530
Not too trustworthy
November 6th, 2009 at 5:41 am
[...] I turned online yesterday, there was conversation surrounding the Malwarebytes blog post, in which they have very publicly accused IObit of stealing their proprietary database(s). [...]
November 6th, 2009 at 5:42 am
This is the latest “BLAME PUT ON MBAM BY IOBIT”
Aren’t they ashmed yet or they do not want to accept their mistake.
http://forums.iobit.com/showthread.php?p=29709&posted=1#post29709
I really do not know
It seems – after what has been published on our forum – that at least part of this whole fracas comes from MBAM wanting IObit to stop the contest.
We will have to wait and see what happens.
I suspect that IObit will issue a statement about the fate of the contest.
Originally it was scheduled to run 13 bi-weekly competitions, then it became halved – and what will happen now I do not know.
But seeing that it up until now has only run for a 1/3 of the original time I wonder if IObit will feel that they have gotten sufficient advertising and goodwill out of it to bestow the final prize on one of the 4 contenders that we have until now.
Cheers
solbjerg
November 6th, 2009 at 6:17 am
http://forums.iobit.com/showthread.php?p=29712&posted=1#post29712
They are putting clear allegations on the MBAM President.
It seems – after what has been published on our forum – that at least part of this whole fracas comes from MBAM wanting IObit to stop the contest.
In one of the statements from IObit it was mentioned that the president of MBAM had approach them and asked them to stop the contest.
They didn’t – even though they shortened the time it would run (halved it)
Now they have stopped it!
November 6th, 2009 at 6:18 am
[...] [...]
November 6th, 2009 at 1:00 pm
ätsch
1) Im not a racist

2) Im not an American
3) Whether in IT Security or in Defense or in the Construction field. It’s a well known fact that Chinese product are the cheapest and of lowest quality. Whether its their defense equipment or their construction related products.. their products fail on the long run.
4) Cyber warfare is the new weapon of the Chinese government. In the recent past they have targeted US, Indian, Tibetan government agencies etc and others too. And im not surprised when someone here mentioned that this software or another of its kind is/are sponsored by the Chinese government
And I am not surprised if any other Chinese free application one day started downloading malware (remember flashget?)
November 7th, 2009 at 3:54 am
As of now, I think and I believe we can only trust time to reveal all things. I just hope only the truth prevails.
November 7th, 2009 at 4:48 am
Hi MalwareBytes, if it is true, why not prosecute them right now?
November 8th, 2009 at 8:22 am
According to a popular site advisor program, the toolbar that downloads without approval contains “Exploit-ObscuredHtml trojan”.
November 8th, 2009 at 12:25 pm
I used IOBit, and remember thinking that IOBit was too good to be true. Any software originating out of the PRC is suspect. I used IOBit until this morning, and I actually paid money for their products. So they also have my credit card data. I have dealt with the Chinese long enough to know that this deal is a criminal action by either the PRC or an enterprising thief who can code real well. We have to shut them down, but just like the malware they make money from, IOBit will simply re-appear later as another company. Dump IOBit. Malwarebytes, I am your newest customer. Love your Dont.Steal.Software.A. Brilliant. Love you for that. Viral payback is the best recourse you have, because you will never succeed VS IObit in a Chinese court. Chinese court = oxymoron. Word-of-mouth will do the job. Damn, I am sorry they stole your technology.
November 9th, 2009 at 3:15 am
That must burn. We should all know better than to purchase Chinese products to provide any sort of security anyway. If it doesn’t happen legally, IOBit is over regardless.
November 9th, 2009 at 12:54 pm
Iobit is paid by the government of China. All the IoBit clients are netbot, and they are used to collect the information from west. These clients will used as the weapon to send DDOS to some US goverment system in the future.
November 10th, 2009 at 4:01 pm
reading the nonsense 99,99% of the posters dump here one really wonders if the west does not deserve to get busted.
maybe the chinese are right to prevent morons like you from voting. no, they ARE right
good to see how you suffer from paranoia and nationalism. all red blooded all american guys – true war criminals such as calley and the likes.
November 10th, 2009 at 4:20 pm
This just sucks doesn.t it. I have been using IOBit software for about 3 years, and am totally disgusted with the company now. Like many people, when you trust a software company to look after your machine you don’t expect them to steal other company’s code and certainly don’t expect there to be ulterior motives behind the scenes. Goodbye IOBit.
November 11th, 2009 at 7:48 am
Malwarebytes should sue the IObit. Now definitely when the whole world has come to know about the chinese theft story……..they should be punished.
November 11th, 2009 at 12:10 pm
He usado Malwarebytes’ desde hace algun tiempo y de verdad que la he dejado como herramienta Numero 1 en detecciones de Malwares, la cargo entre mis herramientas del dia a dia, No tolero que otra compañia quiera ROBAR sus meritos, el trabajo de Ustedes es duro y se respeta. Demanden a esa red de personas fraudulentas, Cuentan con un fuerte apoyo de los usuarios actuales.
November 13th, 2009 at 6:29 pm
Well…this news sounds stupid and annoying. But have they stolen database from malwarebytes..when they can make by themselves…
November 15th, 2009 at 4:18 am
I think malwarebytes too should give freee promo license keys for its pro version…
November 16th, 2009 at 4:31 am
As far as I rememeber the internet has been set up as f r e e tool and that all that helps to get the internet better is based on shared information.
Since 2 years the ” intellectual rights ” are a high scoring issue, in my opinion those ” intellectual rights ” are killing the same internet.
Iam a paying user of the iobit programm and in fact it does not interest me at all if they implanted a tool form an another company if this tool saves my pc from a visit to the pc doctor.
If that other company does not like it if iobit uses their tool than this is pitty for them but I think a nice letter to iobit and asking for at least a refferal link in the iobit programm is much, much better as calling AVG and ordering them to place iobit on the red alert list!
This ” intellectual rights ” thing is in fact a crual for the complete digital industry.
For example: i have a 45 km car, factory Ligier. That car has parts of Peugeot, Renault, Fiat and Citroen in it. None of the called car factories is complaining and nobody asks me to pay a yearly fee to one of them or Ligier. And nobody is asking me to pay a fee if I take somebody into my car.
But if I buy a cd, the price is included rights for artist,componist and recordcompany ( allmost 75 percent of the total price of the cd ).
As long as I listen it in private, nobody is complaining but at the moment I play 1 or 2 tracks for an amouint of ppl bigger as 10 persons….I have to pay ” intellectual rights ” again, they call it republishing.
At the moment I place 1 or 2 tracks on my site to promote the artist, I have to pay again ” intelltual rights “.
And, o dear, if i have the guts to stream it on an internet radio station that has most of the time 4 listeners at 32 Kb/s and refuse to pay ” intellectual rights ” again than….ojojojoj I am a big criminal and RIAA is collecting my house, car and girlfriend….
My advice for companies that like to protect their tools:
Place them on a secured site, if ppl like to buy it, make it useable for 1 pc ( microsoft manner, genuie controlled )or just send it to the ordering customer at cdrom ( useable only for 1 pc )
But as long this tools are easy to get for anybody that is used to be on the internet no yells please if another company uses those tools. I mean it is the same as complaining that burglers entered your house and you forgot to lock the doors…….
Peter
November 19th, 2009 at 11:07 am
I can’t believe IObit has stolen definitions from Malwarebyte. I promptly uninstalled IObit’s defragment program because I believed a company that stolen definitions and denied allegations won’t hestitate to install malwares on my computer.
November 20th, 2009 at 2:24 am
[...] [...]
November 21st, 2009 at 8:10 pm
[...] For your consideration, regarding IObit Security 360 and Advanced SystemCare: http://malwarebytes.besttechie.net/2…tual-property/ [...]
November 25th, 2009 at 7:03 am
I still see IObit on download.com, how can I help you to tell download.com remove that garbage?
November 25th, 2009 at 7:35 pm
I agree 100% with post # 82 – RNI2020
November 16th, 2009 at 4:31 am
November 26th, 2009 at 8:06 pm
[...] and rogue.exe so you can see they are benign. You can see a screenshot of our detections here. Entire Article __________________ We are all here to help each other! If you are a guest reading these [...]
November 26th, 2009 at 10:08 pm
Sue IObit!
December 11th, 2009 at 4:35 pm
Personally I do NOT condone the acts of iobit should this be true BUT I also believe that malwarebytes is using this as an unfair way to get rid of competition.
December 13th, 2009 at 4:55 am
Unfair way of getting rid of competition?
Hold up… IOBIT STOLE MALWARE-BYTES DEFINITION DATABASE… where’s your common sense bro? This is how the world rolls.
December 23rd, 2009 at 11:24 am
It’s my understanding that huge amounts of malware are submitted to IOBit by users. There, it is sorted and added to the database. It’s the job of the database keepers to see there are no common malware names. It must be changed to unique names so they won’t be accused of stealing data from other anti malware developers. Well, what if the database guy is not careful? Is he stealing, or is he careless?
Developers should be required to create and use common malware names so he public can learn and be aware of them. A common piece of malware should not have 50 aliases! Developers should not be in legal jeopardy jest because they use a malware name that is not unique.
December 31st, 2009 at 10:15 pm
i think that they should just remove IObit security 360 program from the downloads sites and keep Advanced Care on
January 7th, 2010 at 1:52 pm
for might be able to afford to start a company.. something synonamous with “sue the b#***”
2nd on my list: iobit
1st: download.com
malware can be something that is the “consequence” of something that does not work.
January 13th, 2010 at 11:12 am
Hmm, if Iobit is stealing virus definitions- could they also be stealing technical data from their customers computers too? Industrial espionage is big business these days…. Countries like China have been accused of supporting industrial espionage!
http://arstechnica.com/security/news/2007/11/report-chinese-conduct-aggressive-and-large-scale-espionage-against-us.ars
January 15th, 2010 at 6:15 pm
[...] You can read the allegations here: http://malwarebytes.besttechie.net/2009/11/02/iobit-steals-malwarebytes-intellectual-property/ [...]
January 31st, 2010 at 11:24 pm
I would have added their own executable or other system critical files as malware to the definition update, and had the name as HAHA.GOTYA.MALWARE and randomly change it’s detection rules for a few weeks.
Then later retract it as a false positive a month or 2 later.
1) They would have contacted malwarebytes about the FP
2) It would have given them enough grief to have to edit it each time they used malwarebytes databases.
3) Confused the heck out of them if they blindly added it’s rules, for their own anti-malware to block itself.
February 2nd, 2010 at 10:47 am
Using others hard works for get money without any permission is a bad things…
IObit is not the best security provider but it is stealing other works make it worst…
February 6th, 2010 at 9:56 am
Is there any evidence that they are Chinese? Their site pretends they are American – look here – http://www.iobit.com/about.html
Is there any evidence that they are phishing or doing other evil things?
February 6th, 2010 at 10:22 am
To add to my comment above look at the statement from the company protesting their innocence HERE
http://msmvps.com/blogs/donna/archive/2009/11/03/iobit-is-denies-stealing-of-mbam-database.aspx
There is a mistake in nearly every line – check out with someone who teaches English to Chinese.
Are these stock photos http://www.iobit.com/about.html
If they are doing what Google accused the Chinese of just look at the astonishing range of companies that have been taken in;
http://www.iobit.com/pressroom.html
February 16th, 2010 at 2:29 pm
The picture under Who we are, on http://www.iobit.com/about.html does indeed appear to be a stock photo, as you can ascertain by putting http://www.iobit.com/about.html where it says “Paste URL here” on http://www.tineye.com/ and clicking on the happy IOBIT team’s image…
February 28th, 2010 at 6:44 pm
Map makes “copyright” their maps by including small mistakes, so if they are used w/o payment it is clear who actually did the work.I think They would have contacted malwarebytes about the FPIt’s my understanding that huge amounts of malware are submitted to IOBit by users